Master
Your Game
This Issue: Meeting Effectiveness
Dear Reader,
Summary
Over the next few weeks, I will
discuss the topic of designing effective meetings.
Excellent meetings are productive, engaging, and synergistic;
participants emerge from these sessions filled with great enthusiasm,
energy, and a greater clarity of purpose. Effective meetings
facilitate collective decisions that people will actively support by
following through and taking action. Unfortunately, not all meetings
are effective. Meetings can be energy-draining, time-wasting and
costly.
The Hidden Cost of Meetings
Each of us as team members can make a positive contribution
to creating highly effective meetings. Each of us can play a role in
setting the agenda, designing the meeting, facilitating the
discussion, and providing feedback on the meeting's effectiveness.
Meetings are a good indicator for determining the performance level
of teams. In general, the more effective the meeting, the more
high-performing the team.
Ineffective meetings represent a huge opportunity cost to
organizations in terms of lost productivity by participants and
foregone opportunities for the organization. Poor meetings lack
synergistic and creative thought. Poor meetings also lack the final
step: ACTION. If a decision is not inclusive, members lack the
motivation to implement the solution. Consequently, the time and
effort that went into the process represents a hidden cost to the
organization.
How Effective Are Your Meetings?
Let's determine the effectiveness of your meetings. Please go
through each item carefully and give yourself an honest score using
this rating system of 1 to 5: 1 - Totally disagree,
2 -
Disagree, 3 - Doesn't apply/not sure, 4 - Agree, 5 - Totally
agree.
- People tend to resist the idea of another meeting.
- Meetings generally do not start or end on time.
- When a member offers an idea, other members do not ask
detailed questions or demonstrate active listening.
- Discussions begin before it's clear to everyone exactly what
is being discussed.
- One or two members dominate the meeting.
- The meeting often ends before everyone has been heard.
- People do not address each other directly, but talk about
others as if they were not in the room.
- Many ideas have to be repeated several times before they get a
response.
- The formal leader or chair seems to have more weight than
other members.
- People start to disagree with others before they really
understand what's being said.
- Following meetings, there are postmortems behind closed doors
about what really went on.
- There is never any assessment at the end of meetings to see
whether the group has achieved what it set out to do.
- People react to new ideas by making fun, uttering put-downs,
or ignoring the idea altogether rather than questioning and
exploring it further.
- Too many people sit in the meetings not really participating.
- After the meeting, there is always some confusion about what
was agreed upon and who is responsible for implementation.
- Few decisions are made by consensus; the group lets
individuals make decisions, or it tends to vote on issues without
much preceding discussion/analysis.
- The group often cannot make decisions because it does not have
the necessary information, or people have not done their homework.
- There is seldom any checking to see whether the group has gone
off track, or if the meeting is an effective use of time.
- Too often we agree on a course of action because everyone is
tired, or cannot be bothered to delve deeper.
- People seem to leave the meeting drained of energy.
- The members seem to spend a disproportionate amount of time at
the start of meetings trying to define the problem they're
supposed to be working on.
- During meetings people arrive late, ask to be excused early,
are frequently called out, and so on.
*Adapted from Facilitating With Ease , Ingrid Bens,
Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Next Steps
If you gave yourself a rating of mostly 1 and 2,
congratulations to you and your team. You are on track. If you rated
4 or 5 on at least 10 questions, your group can benefit from a
meeting effectiveness refresher.
In the next few issues, I will provide you with pointers on
how to improve your meetings.
Wishing you engaging meetings,
Jacque
Catalyst will facilitate meetings for your organization or
work with a team for a short period of time to coach them on the
principles of effective meetings. Hiring Catalyst to teach your
teams basic facilitation skills would reduce the amount of time
spent in meetings and increase productivity.
Catalyst Business Coaching is a corporate development
organization. It works with people who want to achieve a greater
sense of success for both themselves and others in the organization.
It supports people to develop strong interpersonal communication
skills and build foundations to develop dynamic teams. Jacque Small,
principal and owner of Catalyst, founded the company in
2000.